Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Not everyone is going to have a wide screen monitor.
That's why I shown all docks as separate menus ("Properties", "Mapping", "Transform") that everyone can arrange to suit their needs ans the screen size.
Sorry for the size of my screenshot (I admit, I wanted to emphasize the ribbon effect;), however I seriously believe that now, when big screns became so ubiquitious (many of my average-home-e-mail+mp3-only-user-friends (in Poland!) have them) what should restrain the designers from using it? Masochism? My impression is, however, that some parts of the FCP's interface seem to ignore priceless advantages of the big screens...
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:The transform tab may be better floating than docked
Personally, I strongly disagree (for me it only continuously changes its state from distracting obstacle to a curtain floating in front of something), however please note that in my version you can always undock it.
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:the basic idea of adding composite glyph properties to the transform tab is good enough.
I think that the main idea for me is the direct access- basically less clicking switching tabs and opening the windows (especially those like "Properties", where theres' actually only few things!)
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:I don't see the need for add/remove buttons on the composite glyph dialogue. It could lead to errors, and what is its purpose?
A umlaut always has two composite glyph members.
Well, but not always everything runs so smooth, like W+umlaut that needs more space between dots, so you can easily make it from two periods etc. More powerful the feature, more mess can it accidentaly quickly produce, but should we give it all up? It's just to make everything more flexible, that's it.
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:Manual kerning should be avoided as far as possible — it is very tedious — though using shortcuts Shift Left, Ctrl Left, and Left cursor to adjust values saves a lot of clicking around. Importing kern values from a text file saves a lot of time, but you still need to create at least one source file by exporting kerning values, and values for bold and italic are not often the same as for the regular typeface.
Very true (thanks for the priceless shortcuts!)
Bhikkhu Pesala wrote:the idea of kerning pair groups so that only one value needs to be entered for VA, VÄ, VÀ etc., would be a big improvement.
I'm very glad you like it- I really think it would be an absolutely powerful tool connecting advantages of the manual control with digital automation. Simply the best of both worlds!