Font Forum

I think in Notepad on Windows 11 both font fail to display the text correctly.
So I am not sure why it fails.

Maybe you need to manually set OT Class to Base for specific glyphs?

Do you still have this issue with this unofficial update?

https://www.high-logic.com/tmp/fontcrea ... 84-x64.exe

If so, then please send the font project to me, so I can try to reproduce the problem.

Sir its work perfectly in Web Browser. I told you about Notepad & FontCreator preview windows itself. notepad dotted.png image shows Notepad file and FC preview issue.jpg image shows FontCreator's own view I already explained the bidi issue, so that is why it has some issues in the Preview pane...

It seems fine in the webbrowser or is it wrong in some way?

Then do report the bug to Adobe.

It all seems to work fine in a webbrowser if I open and export file:
Font1 FC15 project.fcp

If things still fail on your side then please provide the font project along with the text.

Some more changes related to OT Class:

https://www.high-logic.com/tmp/fontcrea ... 84-x64.exe

Please let us know your results.

The previous version did a better job at guessing the OT Class. For example arabicendofayah_extendedarabicindictwo_smallhighlamalefcomb-arab.ccmp used to be set to Base, while version 15 set it to a Mark. That caused the problem, and this release has a fix for it. https://www.high-logic.com/tmp/font...

If it is still an issue in web browsers, then it most likely is an issue within FontCreator.

We will look into this and get back to you as soon as we located the cause of the problem.

Over the years Adobe has fixed numerous issues related to font support in their software, but there are still many issues. To make it more complex, they use three different font shaping engines (a basic one, a composer one for complex scripts, and optionally/ experimental Harfbuzz), so what works in...

This release solves the issues.

https://www.high-logic.com/tmp/fontcrea ... 82-x64.exe

Please let us know your results.

I tested both in a web browser and it all works just fine.

Please send me a clear instruction on how to reproduce the problem. If you tell me in what Word processor you made those screenshots and provide the text, then I might be able to investigate further.

faisal.quadirey wrote: ↑Thu May 16, 2024 11:09 am Thanks but when I export font from this latest software its also destroyed my font and does not working in any software.

What problems and in what software? Here it all seems to work just fine in a web browser.

Unfortunately the way our shaping engine handles bidi direction is far from complete, so this will remain an issue. Better test your font in a web browser.

1. name ID=1 and 2 are still not exported even when explicitly in Font Properties - Font - Family Name and Instances - General - Style Name. Sorry I was unclear on this one: localised names in UFO are missing ID=1 and 2. In the attached UFO (zipped) file, you can see there is only name ID=16 but no...