Composite glyphs vs Simple glyphs

Hi,

I have made extensive use of Composite glyphs. I have even chained Composite glyphs {A←B←C←D}.
It works very well, as an improvement to a base glyph is automatically reflected in the chained Composite glyphs.

And so to my question:

  • Should I convert all Composite glyphs to Simple glyphs before I export to an installable font? Or does it not matter?

Thank you, Julian.

No need to convert them to simple glyphs.

Although we can’t confirm it, one exception might be if you have used one of the following glyph member properties: Scale, Rotation, Transformation.

Hi,

Thank you Erwin for your response.

For the vast majority of my composite glyphs the position is changed and are scaled to 0.6667.

I think what I will do is keep them as composite glyphs; as the Bold Transform works better if the components are kept separate. I can always reopen the exported font and simplify the glyphs then.

Thank you for your help.
How the world has changed since I was designing 5x7 fonts back in the 1970s.
Regards Julian.