Arabic VS English - localized Feature

Get help with FontCreator here. Please do not post feature requests or bug reports here.
Post Reply
yazode
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:42 pm

Arabic VS English - localized Feature

Post by yazode » Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:51 pm

Hi,

We have a font that has Arabic and Latin (English) glyphs, everything is great except the Multiplication Sign. It is designed for the Arabic language, so when we use it in English it is way bigger and looks bad.
We want to Substitute it with another one we designed when the English language is used.
Do you have any suggestions on how we could do that, because (Required Chaining Context) just replaces the glyph using backtrack and lookahead. If we use a space it doesn’t substitute.
if we use Localized feature it doesn't work in Office Word.

For example:
in Required Chaining Context
(13256×1245) good substitution
(1231 × 1354) doesn’t substitute because of the spaces
please help
this is our script:
designer.JPG
designer.JPG (103.1 KiB) Viewed 611 times

Erwin Denissen
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8318
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2002 12:41 am
Location: Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Arabic VS English - localized Feature

Post by Erwin Denissen » Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:24 am

You could add a single substitution lookup to the standard ligatures feature (liga) or to the contextual alternates feature (calt) for Latin script.
Erwin Denissen
High-Logic
Proven Font Technology

yazode
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:42 pm

Re: Arabic VS English - localized Feature

Post by yazode » Fri Jan 04, 2019 4:20 pm

Erwin Denissen wrote:
Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:24 am
You could add a single substitution lookup to the standard ligatures feature (liga) or to the contextual alternates feature (calt) for Latin script.
Thank you so much. I'll try that and I'll update you

yazode
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2019 3:42 pm

Re: Arabic VS English - localized Feature

Post by yazode » Sat Jan 05, 2019 1:27 am

Erwin Denissen wrote:
Fri Jan 04, 2019 11:24 am
You could add a single substitution lookup to the standard ligatures feature (liga) or to the contextual alternates feature (calt) for Latin script.
unfortunately it didn't work.

Contextual Alternates gave similar results to Required Chaining Context.

standard ligatures also requires a string of characters. and if space is involved then it doesn't work

any ideas?

Post Reply