Thank you for your interest.Alfred wrote:My copy of Ligatures 004 seems to lack a glyph for the 'sh' ligature. Have you added some new glyphs since then?William wrote:I have now made a font Ligatures 006 with the following OpenType code.
Code: Select all
script latn { feature DiscretionaryLigatures; feature Ligatures; } feature DiscretionaryLigatures dlig { lookup dligSub; } lookup dligSub { sub c t -> c_t; sub s h -> s_h; sub s t -> s_t; sub colon colon one zero zero one six colon semicolon -> ls10016; sub colon colon one zero zero one seven colon semicolon -> ls10017; } feature Ligatures liga { lookup ligaSub; } lookup ligaSub { sub f f i -> f_f_i; sub f f l -> f_f_l; sub f f -> f_f; sub f i -> fi; sub f j -> f_j; sub f l -> fl; sub d a -> d_a; sub longs t -> longs_t; sub colon colon -> lsmbob; sub colon semicolon -> lsmbcb; }
Yes, I added the sh ligature because I did not have an sp ligature that was in the High-Logic default template code from which I started, so I changed it.
Here is the font.
I got the sh ligature glyph from my Sonnet to a Renaissance Lady font that is available from its own thread in the Gallery section of this forum.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=1476
Most of the glyphs in the Ligatures 006 font all come from either the Sonnet to a Renaissance Lady font or from the Localizable Sentences 034 font. The exception is that I made the da ligature specially. This is because I wanted a non-standard ligature to test the font in PagePlus X5.
viewtopic.php?p=18770#p18770
There is a list of ligature code points that I devised some years ago.
http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~ngo/golden.htm
The basic characters for the series of Localizable Sentences fonts all came from the Sonnet to a Renaissance Lady font some years ago..
William