I have been thinking about this and wonder if I may comment please.
Firstly some facts.
Erwin is running a business. I am not running a business. I think that I would not be able to run a business.
I do like progress. I like the idea that the person who started this thread is, if I may put it this way, reaching for the stars and making progress and I like to encourage people reaching for the stars and trying to make progress.
I wonder as to how many more similar requests would need to be received and I wonder whether if the task were done then some more people might start to use FontCreator as a result of the new capability becoming available.
Yet I do appreciate that I am not running a business.
So I have tried to think of a solution and wonder if there is some way that FontCreator could have a system of plug-ins, like Adobe Photoshop has plug-ins. I sometimes use Photoshop plug-ins even though I do not have Photoshop, because there are also budget programs, such as Serif PhotoPlus, that can use some Photoshop plug-ins.
In that way, a thread such as this one could, instead of simply ending, become a discussion amongst interested participants in this forum and maybe, just maybe, the code for the plug-in could be produced as a discussion group effort.
To me, and I do emphasise that I am not running a business and thus not needing to have the same priorities as someone who is running a business, it is not important how many people want the Unicode Variation Sequences facility, to me what matters is that an attempt is being made to produce progress and I like progress to happen.
So, having written the above, I hope that something can come of it.
William Overington
30 November 2009