I have been trying FontCreator 5.6 and noticed that a new font has many fewer glyphs than did a new font produced using FontCreator 5.5.
Certainly I can work around this by copying and then pasting using CTRL+E from one of my existing fonts. However, I am wondering as to why the change has been made please.
However, the ready-done glyphs are a good idea and useful.
I am wondering if it might be a good idea to have the glyph complement of a new font selectable within the dialogue panel when the new font is produced.
For example, if someone has the idea of submitting a font to Monotype there is a particular minimum glyph set that is required.
http://www.itcfonts.com/About/Submit.htm
I found that I usually added AE macron, ae macron, Y macron and y macron to the glyph complement produced in a new font produced using FontCreator 5.5. As well as a basic English alphabet I tend to implement the glyphs needed for Old English transcription, Esperanto, Welsh and Latvian.
http://forum.high-logic.com:9080/t/latvian/1000/1
I also tend to add various glyphs into the Unicode Private Use Area as well, though that is another story!
William Overington
24 July 2007