I was hoping I could get a professional analysis of this font.
http://www.extraxa.com/webposts/ICE044.TTF
I can’t take credit for it, in fact, it’s a little bit sketchy because I plan on using this in a software program I’m releasing, but this is like the phantom font, it comes with a name of “Ice’n Gothic Bold” and that’s it! No copyright info, no nothing. Actually, I’ve probably got 5,000 fonts on my machine from downloads and those $10 dollar CDs, and I’d say maybe half of them are the same in that there’s no telling where they came from.
Anyways, for me, about 98% of the time, it’s all about cleanliness and legibility at small sizes and in my opinion there are Tahoma and Verdana, and then everybody else. (Admittedly, the fonts I’m comparing them to are, as mentioned before, from somewhat dubious sources, I’m sure Adobe has stuff that could match, if only I could afford it.)
But this one, I was amazed, I’ve skimmed through all 5,000 of my fonts on more than a few occasions and this is one of the very few that to me is in the same league as Tahoma and Verdana. So I was completely shocked when I saw how many errors the error report dug up on this font. We’re talking multiple redundant points on just about every single glyph. Here’s an example:
In the part that’s circled, how many points and curves would a professional fontographer be able to narrow that mess down to?
And how on earth did it get so crowded? Is this definately something someone scanned in, because I can’t imagine a person plotting that many points and curves.
Alright then, sorry for the novel-length post here, but I really am just getting into this world of fonts, I had no idea there was so much to it, I had no real comprehension of what a great form of art it is, so I was hoping I could just get some opinions of this, my new favorite font. (Especially after I clean it up!)