There is no doubt that FontCreator is almost fully self-sufficient, offering powerful tools to build a complete font project from start to finish—especially for Arabic fonts that involve cursive connections, contextual substitutions, ligatures, and diacritics.
At this point, I would also like to sincerely commend Mr. Erwin for the tremendous effort he has invested in developing FontCreator. Thanks to his remarkable work, many of us feel a great sense of confidence and reassurance while working within this environment, which is indeed a major advantage for type designers.
That being said, I have recently come across discussions regarding the capabilities of FontLab, particularly in the area of smooth and effortless weight generation using tools like Power Nudge and other AI-powered features. It is said that FontLab greatly simplifies the process of creating new weights, with automatic outline adjustments and interpolation between masters.
This brings me to a simple, yet important, practical question:
Would it be advisable or beneficial to combine FontLab with FontCreator—using FontLab solely for generating new font weights and perhaps adjusting kerning—then returning to FontCreator for the final OpenType feature programming and font export?
Or, in your experience, is FontCreator fully capable of handling the entire process—including Arabic font weight generation and kerning—without the need for external tools?
Personally, I feel very comfortable within FontCreator and prefer not to leave its environment. However, at the same time, I care deeply about achieving the best possible result for my current Arabic font project.
I truly believe this kind of discussion will serve as a valuable source of inspiration for all of us, including the developers, as we strive to improve our tools and workflows.