Alright.
Moving forward.
Could you explain the problem with nn please? I had a quick look on the web, but, thus far I cannot find anything.
The sentences in the experimental set thus far include the following.
U+F9012 LOCALIZABLE SENTENCE NO.
U+F9013 LOCALIZABLE SENTENCE YES.
U+F9014 LOCALIZABLE SENTENCE INDEFINITE NO.
U+F9015 LOCALIZABLE SENTENCE INDEFINITE YES.
U+F9016 LOCALIZABLE SENTENCE I DO NOT KNOW.
U+F9017 LOCALIZABLE SENTENCE I NEED MORE INFORMATION IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO ANSWER.
U+F9018 LOCALIZABLE SENTENCE I REFUSE TO ANSWER.
Please know that I am approaching this as research. I am interested to know the limits to the localizable sentences experiments that I have suggested. Maybe the idea will be as impossible as some people have suggested but if that is the case I feel that I need to have that proven.
I hope that I do not seem unreasonable in not taking other people’s word for it. I do have experience with one of my other ideas long ago when some people told me that it would not work, but it did and today it is in use. However, I was not there going from one academic discipline area to another. I am quite ready to accept the possibility that the localizable sentences will not work if significant specific situations are found that cause the idea to crash.
The situation with colours is interesting.
Yet I am wondering in which languages the localization of the sentence “The colour is brown.” would cause a problem.
William Overington
21 January 2010